Ame time, they learned more about the responsibilities associated with caring for others. They understood that their parents had migrated to assist the family and provide them with income; and they subsequently assumed more responsibility for the well-being of their younger siblings. After migrating to the U.S., they continued to show both their independence and interdependence by learning English and working hard to build friendship networks that would complement their family resources and act as an extended family in the U.S. Though not emphasized in our results, others have also identified how immigrant youth utilize their English skills to assist their parents with medical, legal, and educational matters. In particular, older siblings translate for parents, provide childcare, and assist younger siblings with homework (Dorner, Orellana, Jim ez, 2008; Fuligni Penderson, 2002). In our interviews, youth also discussed the importance of selectively acculturating to American norms of behavior. As predicted by Portes and Rumbaut (2001) and Fuligni (2001), they adopted some American cultural beliefs and behaviors (e.g., English language skills and styles of dress) but also selectively retained other Latino cultures and customs (e.g., a strong work ethic, respect for parental authority, and building and sustaining personal relationships with a broad array of community members). By blending the best of both worlds, they adopted a strategy of adaptation that they believed would best promote their well-being. Strengths and Limitation A major strength of this study is that it provides insights into the migration and acculturation experience from the perspective and using the voices of first-generation Latino immigrant youth. Additionally, this study Naramycin A dose contributes to the small, but growing body of TariquidarMedChemExpress Tariquidar literature on the immigration and acculturation processes experienced by immigrant youth growing up in emerging Latino communities. These Latino communities typically lack the social networks and institutions that facilitate immigrant adaptation to the U.S.; therefore, the experiences of Latino youth settling in these communities may differ from their peers in more established Latino communities such as Los Angeles and Houston. Though our study has several strengths, it also has limitations that provide fertile ground for additional research to better understand the migration experience and its effects on adolescent development. First, our qualitative interviews focused on adolescents enrolled in high school. However, some adolescents migrate to the U.S. to work and never enroll in high school while others drop out of high school as soon as legally possible (Fry, 2003). Second, the majority of youth participating in our qualitative interviews were of Mexican origin and from low-income families who migrated primarily for economic reasons. The experiences of immigrant youth and families who migrate for educational reasons, who have substantial socio-economic resources, or who migrate in response to civil strife and political violence can differ dramatically from the experiences of the youth we interviewed (Zuniga, 2002). More research is needed to understand the experiences of these important subsets of first-generation immigrant youth and the way these experiences shape their development. Third, our research was cross-sectional and based entirely in the U.S. Thus, we are not able to observe the process of individual change over time or in comparison to.Ame time, they learned more about the responsibilities associated with caring for others. They understood that their parents had migrated to assist the family and provide them with income; and they subsequently assumed more responsibility for the well-being of their younger siblings. After migrating to the U.S., they continued to show both their independence and interdependence by learning English and working hard to build friendship networks that would complement their family resources and act as an extended family in the U.S. Though not emphasized in our results, others have also identified how immigrant youth utilize their English skills to assist their parents with medical, legal, and educational matters. In particular, older siblings translate for parents, provide childcare, and assist younger siblings with homework (Dorner, Orellana, Jim ez, 2008; Fuligni Penderson, 2002). In our interviews, youth also discussed the importance of selectively acculturating to American norms of behavior. As predicted by Portes and Rumbaut (2001) and Fuligni (2001), they adopted some American cultural beliefs and behaviors (e.g., English language skills and styles of dress) but also selectively retained other Latino cultures and customs (e.g., a strong work ethic, respect for parental authority, and building and sustaining personal relationships with a broad array of community members). By blending the best of both worlds, they adopted a strategy of adaptation that they believed would best promote their well-being. Strengths and Limitation A major strength of this study is that it provides insights into the migration and acculturation experience from the perspective and using the voices of first-generation Latino immigrant youth. Additionally, this study contributes to the small, but growing body of literature on the immigration and acculturation processes experienced by immigrant youth growing up in emerging Latino communities. These Latino communities typically lack the social networks and institutions that facilitate immigrant adaptation to the U.S.; therefore, the experiences of Latino youth settling in these communities may differ from their peers in more established Latino communities such as Los Angeles and Houston. Though our study has several strengths, it also has limitations that provide fertile ground for additional research to better understand the migration experience and its effects on adolescent development. First, our qualitative interviews focused on adolescents enrolled in high school. However, some adolescents migrate to the U.S. to work and never enroll in high school while others drop out of high school as soon as legally possible (Fry, 2003). Second, the majority of youth participating in our qualitative interviews were of Mexican origin and from low-income families who migrated primarily for economic reasons. The experiences of immigrant youth and families who migrate for educational reasons, who have substantial socio-economic resources, or who migrate in response to civil strife and political violence can differ dramatically from the experiences of the youth we interviewed (Zuniga, 2002). More research is needed to understand the experiences of these important subsets of first-generation immigrant youth and the way these experiences shape their development. Third, our research was cross-sectional and based entirely in the U.S. Thus, we are not able to observe the process of individual change over time or in comparison to.