N t The outcomes showed that there were important effects inside the frontal region (F(5145) = six.738, group element. p 0.001, 2 = 20.519), within the parietal region (F(5145) = 2.909, p = 0.16 0.05, 2 = 28.324), The outcomes showed that there were significant effects within the frontal region (F(514 within the central region (F(5145) = eight.650, p 0.001, 2 = 15.367), and in the occipital area 6.738, p 0.001, 2 = 20.519), inside the parietal region (F(5145) = 2.909, p = 0.16 0.05, (F(5145) = two.538, p = 0.31 0.05, two = 26.582), all with substantial imaging pattern sort 28.324), in the central region (F(5145) = eight.650, p 0.001, 2 = 15.367), and inside the occip grouping (Group) effects. The evaluation showed that in the frontal area, the energy evoked region (F(5145) = two.538, p = 0.31 0.05, 2 = 26.582), all with considerable imaging pat by C1 W-19-d4 medchemexpress stimuli is considerably larger than the power evoked by C0 (p = 0.003 0.05), type grouping (Group) effects. The evaluation showed that in the frontal area, the ene C2-2 (p = 0.002 0.05), C3-30 (p = 0.006 0.05), and C3-180 (p = 0.004 0.05) stimulus. evoked by C1 stimuli is drastically higher than the energy evoked by C0 (p = 0.0 Within the parietal region, the power evoked by C1 stimuli is significantly greater than the 0.05), C22 (p = 0.002 0.05), C330 (p = 0.006 0.05), and C3180 (p = 0.004 0.05) stimu energy evoked by C0 (p = 0.025 0.05), C2-1 (p = 0.007 0.05), and C3-180 (p = 0.01 0.05) In the parietal area, the power evoked by C1 stimuli is substantially larger than stimulus. In the central zone, the energy evoked by C1 stimuli is significantly greater than power evoked by C0 (p = 0.025 0.05), C21 (p = 0.007 0.05), and C3180 (p = 0.01 0 the power evoked by C0 (p 0.001), C2-1 (p = 0.006 0.05), C2-2 (p = 0.0005 0.05), C3-30 stimulus. Inside the central zone, the power evoked by C1 stimuli is considerably greater t (p = 0.008 0.05), and C3-180 (p = 0.001 0.05) stimulus. Within the occipital region, the energy evoked by C1 stimuli is considerably larger than these evoked by C2-1 (p = 0.035 0.05) and C2-2 (p = 0.0014 0.05) stimuli (as shown in Figure five).Sensors 2021, 21,the power evoked by C0 (p 0.001), C21 (p = 0.006 0.05), C22 (p = 0.0005 0.05), C330 (p = 0.008 0.05), and C3180 (p = 0.001 0.05) stimulus. In the occipital region, the energy evoked by C1 stimuli is significantly larger than these evoked by C21 (p = 0.035 0.05) 9 of 16 and C22 (p = 0.0014 0.05) stimuli (as shown in Figure 5).Figure five. The distribution of EEG waves in brain regions together with the theta wave frequency band, indicates p 0.05. Figure 5. The distribution of EEG waves in brain regions together with the theta wave frequency band, indicates p 0.05.three.three.3. Brain Pyridoxatin Description Topography 3.three.3. Brain Topography Figure 6 is usually a brain topographic map based on the typical energy of all subjects. Amongst them, redis a brain higher brain wave primarily based on the typical power of all subjects. Figure 6 indicates topographic map activity when blue indicates lower brain wave activity. As outlined by the energy distribution from the brain topographic map, the energy Among them, red indicates larger brain wave activity though blue indicates lower brain Sensors 2021, 21, x FOR PEER Review 10 of 16 induced by C0 stimulation is reasonably low inside the frontal lobe, parietal lobe, and occipital wave activity. Based on the energy distribution of your brain topographic map, the en lobe, while the energy induced by C1 is comparatively is relativel.