Ed in the presence of chitosan. In contrast all the TLR adjuvant candidates significantlyVaginal immunisation with gp140 and TTVaginal administration of CN54gp140 failed to induce detectable systemic or vaginal IgG and IgA responses. Likewise, none of the candidate adjuvants tested induced specific systemic antibody titres following vaginal immunisation. Lack of local vaginalFigure 4. Intranasal immunisation with Tetanus toxoid. Endpoint titres for IgG (A, C) and IgA (B, D) in sera (upper panels) and vaginal 1676428 washes (lower panels) from animals immunised three times with Tetanus toxoid intranasally. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the different adjuvant/antigen groups and the PBS buy Dimethylenastron control group. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050529.gMucosal TLR Adjuvants for HIV-gpFigure 5. Intravaginal immunisation with Tetanus toxoid. Endpoint titres for IgG (A, C) and IgA (B, D) in sera (upper panels) and vaginal washes (lower panels) from animals immunised three times with Tetanus toxoid intravaginally. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050529.gFigure 6. Subcutaneous immunisation with gp140. Endpoint titres for IgG (A, C) and IgA (B, D) in sera (upper panels) and vaginal washes (lower panels) from animals immunised three times with gp140 subcutaneously. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the different adjuvant/ antigen groups and the PBS control group. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050529.gMucosal TLR Adjuvants for HIV-gpreduced this ratio providing a more balanced response, most evident with 
MPLA. When TT was given subcutaneously, the antigen alone induced very high IgG responses systemically that were enhanced by FSL1, poly I:C, MPLA, and Pam3CSK4 (p,0.01) up to 5.6 fold (Figure 7A). Systemic IgA responses to TT alone were at or below the cut-off for detection (Fig. 7B). Poly I:C and chitosan induced significant TT specific IgA titres (p,0.01) although modest in comparison to other routes of immunisation. In vaginal wash samples, detectable IgG titres were observed, with no significant differences between groups. Specific IgA responses to TT alone were very low but increased by FSL-1, politic, Pam3CSK4 (p,0.01) and MPLA (p = 0.04) (Figure 7C and D). IgG subclass analysis Clavulanate (potassium) chemical information showed that TT given alone induced a very high IgG1/IgG2a ratio, above 50 (Figure S3B). This was significantly reduced by co-administration of TLR agonists: FSL1, MPLA, Pam3CSK4, R848 and CpG B.DiscussionIn the present study, we investigate the impact of a range of TLR ligands as potential adjuvants for different routes of mucosal immunisation 
and their ability to enhance specific antibody responses to gp140 and TT in systemic and vaginal compartments. In addition we characterize the different impact of TLR adjuvants by route of administration on the balance of Th1/Th2 type humoral immune responses. Sublingual immunisation (SL) with antigen alone, either gp140 or TT induced good specific systemic IgG and IgA responses (Figure 1 and 2). For IgA these were better than those achieved with subcutaneous (SC) immunisation. The observed responsesdiffer significantly from studies focusing on SL-delivery of HIV gp41, where no systemic or mucosal immune response was detected in the absence of adjuvant [19]. These discrepancies may reflect differences in administered dose, however we have also observed a lack of responsiveness to gp41 in the absence of adjuvant when administered SL (data not shown) suggesting that the nature of the antigen, size and hydrophobicity, may influe.Ed in the presence of chitosan. In contrast all the TLR adjuvant candidates significantlyVaginal immunisation with gp140 and TTVaginal administration of CN54gp140 failed to induce detectable systemic or vaginal IgG and IgA responses. Likewise, none of the candidate adjuvants tested induced specific systemic antibody titres following vaginal immunisation. Lack of local vaginalFigure 4. Intranasal immunisation with Tetanus toxoid. Endpoint titres for IgG (A, C) and IgA (B, D) in sera (upper panels) and vaginal 1676428 washes (lower panels) from animals immunised three times with Tetanus toxoid intranasally. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the different adjuvant/antigen groups and the PBS control group. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050529.gMucosal TLR Adjuvants for HIV-gpFigure 5. Intravaginal immunisation with Tetanus toxoid. Endpoint titres for IgG (A, C) and IgA (B, D) in sera (upper panels) and vaginal washes (lower panels) from animals immunised three times with Tetanus toxoid intravaginally. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050529.gFigure 6. Subcutaneous immunisation with gp140. Endpoint titres for IgG (A, C) and IgA (B, D) in sera (upper panels) and vaginal washes (lower panels) from animals immunised three times with gp140 subcutaneously. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the different adjuvant/ antigen groups and the PBS control group. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050529.gMucosal TLR Adjuvants for HIV-gpreduced this ratio providing a more balanced response, most evident with MPLA. When TT was given subcutaneously, the antigen alone induced very high IgG responses systemically that were enhanced by FSL1, poly I:C, MPLA, and Pam3CSK4 (p,0.01) up to 5.6 fold (Figure 7A). Systemic IgA responses to TT alone were at or below the cut-off for detection (Fig. 7B). Poly I:C and chitosan induced significant TT specific IgA titres (p,0.01) although modest in comparison to other routes of immunisation. In vaginal wash samples, detectable IgG titres were observed, with no significant differences between groups. Specific IgA responses to TT alone were very low but increased by FSL-1, politic, Pam3CSK4 (p,0.01) and MPLA (p = 0.04) (Figure 7C and D). IgG subclass analysis showed that TT given alone induced a very high IgG1/IgG2a ratio, above 50 (Figure S3B). This was significantly reduced by co-administration of TLR agonists: FSL1, MPLA, Pam3CSK4, R848 and CpG B.DiscussionIn the present study, we investigate the impact of a range of TLR ligands as potential adjuvants for different routes of mucosal immunisation and their ability to enhance specific antibody responses to gp140 and TT in systemic and vaginal compartments. In addition we characterize the different impact of TLR adjuvants by route of administration on the balance of Th1/Th2 type humoral immune responses. Sublingual immunisation (SL) with antigen alone, either gp140 or TT induced good specific systemic IgG and IgA responses (Figure 1 and 2). For IgA these were better than those achieved with subcutaneous (SC) immunisation. The observed responsesdiffer significantly from studies focusing on SL-delivery of HIV gp41, where no systemic or mucosal immune response was detected in the absence of adjuvant [19]. These discrepancies may reflect differences in administered dose, however we have also observed a lack of responsiveness to gp41 in the absence of adjuvant when administered SL (data not shown) suggesting that the nature of the antigen, size and hydrophobicity, may influe.