Egion to inform intervention planning Examine underlying causes of food vulnerability HCESs Measure earnings, customer price indices, socioeconomic status, and meals and non-food expenditures Deliver complementary information to meals balance sheet data to facilitate cross-national comparisons and subnational analyses Variable National Regional Household Economic access Meals quantity Meals high-quality Variable (e.g., 1 wk, 1 mo, 12 mo) (Continued)TABLE 1 (Continued )MetricMeasurementGFSIIndex of 30 indicators within 3 domains of meals safety: affordability (6 indicators), availability (ten), and quality and security (14)FEWS PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20066089 NETMonitors a range of info such as information on Eledone peptide supplier long-term and real-time satellite rainfall records, the NDVI, temperature, agricultural production, costs, trade, financial shocks, political instability, and nearby livelihoodsCFSVAsHCESsCombines secondary data analyses with collection of main information from 13 core modules to assess food security status and examine underlying causes of vulnerability Collect data on all foods acquired by household, which includes food purchases, foods from personal production and foods received in kind; often restricted to monetary value of these foodsTABLE 1 (Continued )Scale National Regional Household Meals top quality CFSVAs WFP Emergency Food Safety Assessments Household surveys Establish prevalence of meals insecurity Monitor modifications in meals security Assist in figuring out food must calculate meals rations 7d Domains/loci measured Date source Objective(s) Recall periodMetricMeasurementFCSHDDSFCS = a1x1+ a2x2+ .+ a8x8, where 1.8 = meals group, a = frequency (7-d recall), x = weight. Weight: meat, milk, and fish = 4, pulses = three, staples = 2, vegetables and fruits = 1, sugar and oil = 0.five). Cut-off values: poor FS = 021, borderline FS = 21.55, acceptable FS = .35. Sums equally weighted response information on the consumption of 12 meals groups; score obtained from 0 to 12 National Regional Household Food high-quality Household surveys24 hCSINational Regional HouseholdEconomic access Meals quantity Food qualityFocus group interviews and discussions30 dHEALocally adapted list of coping methods along with the frequency of their use is generated through concentrate group discussions with stakeholders; severity weightings are assigned to each method Broadly assesses livelihoods making use of geographic patterns of shared livelihood tactics, and wealth and assets Regional Household Physical availability or access Financial accessReview of meals safety metrics 487 Regional HouseholdHFIASSums responses to 9 questions related to four domains of meals safety like 4-level frequency response inquiries; a score from 0 to 27 is obtained and may very well be categorized into a 4-level variableAnxiety Food preferences Economic access Meals quantityRapid rural appraisal methods (e.g., semistructured interviews, focus group discussions) Assessment of several secondary information sources Household surveysServe as a FS effect indicator for USAID Title II funded applications Assist establish prevalence of FS Assess household-level dietary diversity Assess modifications in DD/FS over time Target food help and monitor its effect Identify vulnerable households (original) Facilitate comparisons across contexts (comparative) Estimate long-term adjustments in FS Assess poverty and livelihood vulnerabilitiesVariableIdentify proper, contextspecific interventions Assess FS status within regions or households Monitor and evaluate the effect of FS interventions30 d(Continued)488 Jones et al. Sc.